<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Gotta Start with Imagination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/486/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/486</link>
	<description>Interaction Design, User Experience, and the World at Large</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kynthia</title>
		<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/486/comment-page-1#comment-13993</link>
		<dc:creator>Kynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/486#comment-13993</guid>
		<description>this is a great point.  i love it when you think of something completely off the wall and know you can't do it, but then realize how you can capture some tiny part of it and it makes the design so much richer.  looking for imaginative solutions shows us aspects of the problem we might have otherwise overlooked, and we see deeper as a result.  

nuff said.  

but, erm, do you mean &lt;em&gt;tactful&lt;/em&gt; instead of tactical?  because i don't know me much about guns.  strategy, though.  i can see that.  so maybe either word works.  but i'm not sure what you intended.  and i try to employ both traits in the questioning.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great point.  i love it when you think of something completely off the wall and know you can&#8217;t do it, but then realize how you can capture some tiny part of it and it makes the design so much richer.  looking for imaginative solutions shows us aspects of the problem we might have otherwise overlooked, and we see deeper as a result.  </p>
<p>nuff said.  </p>
<p>but, erm, do you mean <em>tactful</em> instead of tactical?  because i don&#8217;t know me much about guns.  strategy, though.  i can see that.  so maybe either word works.  but i&#8217;m not sure what you intended.  and i try to employ both traits in the questioning.  <img src='http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

