<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392</link>
	<description>Interaction Design, User Experience, and the World at Large</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh, cool post and graphics.  I second your issue with "mental models" and "rating schemes".  I'd probably say that no rating scheme is perfect, but most are better than nothing.  MyStrands has a rating feature that you can use on the website, but the ratings aren't an integral part of the recommendation process.  

Rather than harvesting tenuous "like/dislike" rating data, we harvest playlist based association data.  I'd be interested in hearing what you think about the strengths/weaknesses of both approaches... be brutal... well maybe not too brutal :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh, cool post and graphics.  I second your issue with &#8220;mental models&#8221; and &#8220;rating schemes&#8221;.  I&#8217;d probably say that no rating scheme is perfect, but most are better than nothing.  MyStrands has a rating feature that you can use on the website, but the ratings aren&#8217;t an integral part of the recommendation process.  </p>
<p>Rather than harvesting tenuous &#8220;like/dislike&#8221; rating data, we harvest playlist based association data.  I&#8217;d be interested in hearing what you think about the strengths/weaknesses of both approaches&#8230; be brutal&#8230; well maybe not too brutal <img src='http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Yip</title>
		<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/392#comment-470</guid>
		<description>LaunchCast (http://launch.yahoo.com) was the first of these I've ever tried though I tend to use Pandora now given the embedded player in Yahoo Messenger isn't working and was somewhat unstable.

A cool, relatively recent feature of Pandora is the "I'm tired of this song" so don't play it for a month action.  Sometimes, I like the song but I just don't care to hear it for the next while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaunchCast (http://launch.yahoo.com) was the first of these I&#8217;ve ever tried though I tend to use Pandora now given the embedded player in Yahoo Messenger isn&#8217;t working and was somewhat unstable.</p>
<p>A cool, relatively recent feature of Pandora is the &#8220;I&#8217;m tired of this song&#8221; so don&#8217;t play it for a month action.  Sometimes, I like the song but I just don&#8217;t care to hear it for the next while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
