<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little thing called Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/389/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/389</link>
	<description>Interaction Design, User Experience, and the World at Large</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/389/comment-page-1#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.ev9.org/weblog/archives/389#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I think this is a really interesting phenomenon for designers to study.  Myspace is really ugly too.  Yet both of these sites are ridiculously successful and enable their users to wonderful things.

Honestly, I don't think craigslist should change.  The fact that it hasn't, and the reason craigslist and myspace are so successful is that they are user-centered, not beauty-centered.

Sometimes I wonder whether typographers and snobs* are the only people who get any value from beautiful type.

Of course, people get value when you solve major readability problems or make the visual cues more useful or informative, but in this case, the redesign seems to be mostly about aesthetics.

So my question is: why bother?

* meaning, people who need to be surrounded by "nice things"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a really interesting phenomenon for designers to study.  Myspace is really ugly too.  Yet both of these sites are ridiculously successful and enable their users to wonderful things.</p>
<p>Honestly, I don&#8217;t think craigslist should change.  The fact that it hasn&#8217;t, and the reason craigslist and myspace are so successful is that they are user-centered, not beauty-centered.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder whether typographers and snobs* are the only people who get any value from beautiful type.</p>
<p>Of course, people get value when you solve major readability problems or make the visual cues more useful or informative, but in this case, the redesign seems to be mostly about aesthetics.</p>
<p>So my question is: why bother?</p>
<p>* meaning, people who need to be surrounded by &#8220;nice things&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

